Environmental challenges like climate change, biodiversity loss, and plastic pollution are ultimately challenges of human behaviour. Addressing them requires a deeper understanding of how people think, feel, and interact with the world around them. That's where an applied behavioural scientist comes in.
Explore My ApproachHi there! I've been researching, designing, and implementing behaviour change interventions for over a decade. I've worked on projects in 14+ countries with teams big and small to identify what works and build the systems needed to track real-world impact.
I started my career studying primate decision-making, examining how our closest relatives evaluate rewards and navigate uncertainty. That research, culminating in a PhD from Cambridge, gave me a perspective I still carry: it's our evolutionary history as primates, and the constraints this puts on our brains, that lead to many of the predictable biases we show in our decision-making.
As a behavioural scientist, I've taken these insights and applied them to the most widespread primate of all: humans. At Rare's Center for Behavior & the Environment—the first "nudge unit" dedicated to environmental challenges—I helped shape applied behavioural science in the environmental space, working with organisations around the world to translate research findings into practical, on-the-ground interventions that help communities shift toward sustainable practices.
Now I'm bringing everything I've learned to new partners and problems.
Most environmental programmes aim to change behaviour, but few are designed around how behaviour actually works. They focus on what's visible: awareness, attitudes, stated intentions. But behaviour is shaped just as much by what's harder to see: the social norms people absorb without noticing, the friction that makes good intentions stall, the way choices are framed and structured. These forces operate whether we account for them or not. The question is whether we're designing interventions with them or against them.
Behavioural science replaces intuition with evidence, mapping the psychological, social, and structural factors that shape your audience's choices. You can identify where interventions will have traction and where they'll fall flat, target what actually matters rather than what's easiest to address, and distinguish programmes that generate activity from programmes that generate impact.
Whether you need support on a specific project or want to build your organisation's behaviour change strategy and capability, I work alongside your team to deliver results. For project work, I follow a structured process: discover, design, demonstrate. Each phase can stand alone or combine into a full engagement depending on your needs. I also offer ongoing advisory support for organisations who want a behavioural science partner on retainer.
I help you understand what's really driving behaviour. Through literature reviews, behavioural systems mapping, and mixed-methods research with your stakeholders and target population, I map the actors involved and what shapes their choices: the psychological, social, and structural determinants of behaviour. This research gives you a theory of change that guides intervention design.
I work with your team to design interventions that target the behavioural determinants identified in the Discover phase. The approach depends on what will work best for your context and capacity. It might involve changing how options are presented, tapping into social norms, shifting how something is framed, or rethinking incentives altogether. I help you pilot and refine before you deploy.
I bring rigorous impact evaluation into your programmes from the very start, using RCTs or appropriate quasi-experimental methods to measure shifts in behaviour and its determinants. Beyond measurement, I build your team's capacity to monitor, learn, and adapt in real time, giving you the tools to know how your intervention is performing during its deployment and to course-correct if needed.
I'm also available for talks at conferences, workshops, and panels — bringing the same evidence-based approach to audiences across conservation, climate, and sustainability.
Past efforts to shift Colombian farmers toward sustainable practices had struggled to achieve lasting uptake. For Rare's Lands for Life programme, the research uncovered why: farmers were highly averse to ambiguity, and the norms guiding their decisions weren't aligned with the practices being promoted. These findings shaped a three-phase approach: first, making adoption easy for early adopters; then, making their success visible through social proof; and finally, turning proof into social expectation.
Find out more here →
The Fijian government had promoted vetiver grass planting to help communities reduce riverbank erosion, but uptake had stalled. Working with IISD, the research identified six determinants shaping adoption. Past efforts had likely shifted the dial on some of these, but issues remained: training was too brief, women were excluded despite being key custodians of the riverbanks, and local knowledge was ignored.
Find out more here →
Many environmental challenges are common pool resource dilemmas, and a single intervention is rarely enough. Multiple determinants need to shift at both individual and community levels, and timing matters. For Rare's Fish Forever programme across Asia-Pacific, the work involved shaping interventions and piloting monitoring systems that track shifts in psychological, social, and structural determinants in real time.
Find out more here →Peer-reviewed research, practitioner guides, and reports on behavioural science and environmental impact.
Stanford Social Innovation Review, January 2026 (with Burgess & Reisch)
Argues that conservation has yet to systematically apply behavioural science, lacking the structural integration, standardised frameworks, and rigorous evaluation needed to move beyond isolated nudges to lasting biodiversity outcomes.
Rare's Center for Behavior & the Environment, 2024 (with Williamson)
Expands the traditional environmental toolkit beyond information, rules, and incentives by adding three behavioural levers: emotional appeals, social influences, and choice architecture, with guidance on applying all six to environmental challenges.
Behavioral Scientist, 2021 (with Karak)
Describes a three-phase approach to scaling behaviour change in Colombian agriculture: segmenting populations by resistance level, making early adopters visible through social proof, then building community-wide social expectations.
Rare & GEF STAP, 2020 (with Williamson & Thulin)
Reviews behavioural and social science interventions across five environmental challenges: biodiversity, climate mitigation, water, waste, and land management, assessing evidence strength and practical applicability for GEF programming.
Stanford Social Innovation Review, January 2026 (with Burgess & Reisch)
Argues that conservation has yet to systematically apply behavioural science, lacking the structural integration, standardised frameworks, and rigorous evaluation needed to move beyond isolated nudges to lasting biodiversity outcomes.
Rare, GEF & UNDP, 2025 (with Williamson)
Reviews the behavioural science of plastic waste reduction and documents community-level case studies from six countries, from nudges and choice architecture to social norms and behaviourally informed policy.
Society for Conservation Biology, 2025 (with Del Rosario, Thulin & Ashraf)
A geospatial tool that enables conservation researchers to draw representative survey samples without expensive administrative datasets or comprehensive population lists.
Rare's Center for Behavior & the Environment, 2024 (with Williamson)
Expands the traditional environmental toolkit beyond information, rules, and incentives by adding three behavioural levers: emotional appeals, social influences, and choice architecture, with guidance on applying all six to environmental challenges.
Conference talks, podcasts, interviews, and media appearances on behavioural science and environmental impact.
About Sustainability... The IGES Podcast, 2025
Exploring how behavioural science can address environmental challenges beyond traditional economic incentives, from nudges and choice architecture to overcoming systemic barriers to sustainable behaviour.
POLYPROBLEM, 2025
Featured expert commentary on why the intention-behaviour gap in plastic waste is systemic, not just psychological, and why structural change must accompany individual nudges.
Grist, 2023
Featured expert commentary on France's zero-waste experiments, characterising the "tell them" approach and contrasting it with incentive- and rule-based strategies for behaviour change.
Mongabay Newscast, March 2021
Exploring agroecology as a sustainable alternative, featuring discussion of behavioural science approaches for shifting smallholder farmer practices in Colombia through Rare's Lands for Life programme.
World Food Programme, Adaptation Fund Climate Innovation Accelerator (AFCIA) Bootcamp Plenary, January 2026
Plenary on applying behavioural science principles to climate innovation projects across the Adaptation Fund portfolio.
About Sustainability... The IGES Podcast, November 2025
Exploring how behavioural science can address environmental challenges beyond traditional economic incentives, from nudges and choice architecture to overcoming systemic barriers to sustainable behaviour.
World Bank & TRAFFIC, GWP Guidance Note Series Launch, October 2025
Launch event for practitioner guidance notes on identifying entry points for behaviour change, designing strategies, conducting social research, and crafting conservation messaging.
IUCN Behaviour Change Taskforce, August 2025
On ethical guidance for conservation behaviour change, the unique challenges of a dual mandate for nature and people, and scaling behavioural approaches across contexts.